Monday, 25 February 2013

Leki Photosystem Poles – a real alternative to a high spec monopod..?



Leki Photosystem Poles – a real alternative to a high spec monopod..?


As regular visitors to the site will know, we are all keen photographers/videographers at Trailblazer Outdoors. We all also use walking poles to help get us around when out on the hill. Whilst poles with camera tripod mounts on the top are not new, previous models have all suffered from a few design flaws – particularly for those with heavier camera gear e.g.
   Not tall enough to reach eye-level
   Too heavy
   Less than ideal grip arrangement
Dedicated camera monopods suffer from a similar collection of issues:
   Not designed to take the repeated impact of use as a walking pole
   Too heavy if they are strong enough to support professional gear
   Too expensive for a walking pole if they are made of carbon fibre to reduce the weight to an acceptable level
Now with the launch of the re-vamped Leki Photosystem Poles, we believe that there is a viable option for those of us who want to use walking poles and don’t want to have to carry a dedicated monopod as well. 

There are two models – aluminium alloy, and a carbon fibre – with the former listing at £80, and the latter at £93. The weight of both is about the same at just over 300 grams, with the advantage of the CF model being that is four sections, compared to the three section aluminium. This means that the CF model can extend higher – to 170 cm (67 inches) – whilst the aluminium only reaches 150 cm (… inches). 



What this means in practical terms is that the aluminium pole will take the camera to eye level for most people, but anyone taller than average may have to stoop to use it. This is fine for an occasional shot, but if you are working an area extensively – shooting repeated panoramas and HDR sequences – it may not be ideal. By contrast the CF model has headroom to spare, allowing it to be used comfortably by taller people, and making it more flexible for use on uneven ground.


One way of extending the height of either pole, and allowing its use with a quick release system, is to mount a monopod head on the top (see below). For someone who keeps L-brackets or quick release plates mounted on their cameras, this is definitely an option to consider. The head can easily be attached or removed using the standard ¼ inch captive screw fitted to the pole – which can, of course, be used to mount directly to the tripod bush of the camera itself, if desired.

Obviously adding a monopod head increases the weight of the overall package – doubling it in my case, although you can get lighter heads..! However, I was surprised to find that the weight of a similar CF monopod from Manfrotto came to around the same as the arrangement illustrated above – more with a head such as the one shown. It was also interesting to note that the suggested load capacity for the Manfrotto was only 5 Kg – you wouldn’t want to rely on a walking pole that only offered that level of support..! 

But the killer comparison for me was the price. The Leki CF comes in at £93, which you might then want to add the cost of a monopod head to, if you went down my route. Meanwhile the cheapest I could find the 4 section Manfrotto CF monopod that I used for comparison (Model 694CX) was £135 – with the list price being £162. If you start looking at Gitzo then you double those prices..! 

Both the aluminium and the Carbon poles feature Leki’s ‘quick-lock’ system – which will be familiar to any Manfrotto tripod or monopod user. This quickly allows you to adjust the height from walking level to photo level, and is certainly easier to use for photographic work than the traditional Leki twist-lock. 



Leki claim that the quick lock system easily exceeds the 60 Kg locking force target demanded by safety standards for walking poles. This again made me wonder where the 5 Kg weight limit for the Manfrotto monopod came from – it does make you wonder how two such similar products, but designed from differing starting points, can end up with such differing price/performance figures. 

A couple of notes of caution should be sounded here. Firstly, I have not as yet been out on the hill with the monopod head fitted to either pole. Fitting something as meaty as the head illustrated does change the balance of the pole in your hand. It makes it swing more, since the centre of gravity is shifted substantially upwards. For me this doesn’t feel like an issue, but it certainly does change the way the pole feels. Similarly, the total weight is increased substantially, which is a drawback if what you are after is a ‘fast and light’ solution. 

However, you do have the option of just using the pole as it was intended if this is an issue – with the camera mounted directly onto the captive screw provided. Alternatively you can just take the monopod head on and off as required – but this mitigates against the whole speed and convenience of using quick release plates. 

The other slight concern I have is the stiffness of the poles. The carbon in particular seems to ‘twang’ visibly when you plant it – and that vibration can be felt through the handle. This means that any vibration from the camera mirror and shutter assembly is likely to travel up and down the pole – leading to a risk of camera shake on longer sutter speeds. 

Now the simple solution to this is to use a reasonably fast shutter speed – which these days is advisable anyway given the resolution of modern digital sensors. However, a monopod is inevitably going to get used as an additional means of support in low light conditions as well, so the issue is something to keep an eye on. Of course this issue may apply equally to CF monopods, but you would hope that it is something their manufacturers have addressed. 

So on balance, and bearing the above slight concerns in mind, we think that these new Leki Poles offer a great combination of genuine walking aid with genuine photographic tool. What is more they also seem to offer a cracking deal on cost compared to some of the photographic monopods currently available from major manufacturers. 

We will report further on our experiences with the poles once we have had a chance to use them in anger. In the meantime why not post on our feedback section if you have any thoughts to contribute on the issues noted above. 

John Cliftonfor Trailblazer Outdoors

John works part time at Trailblazer Outdoors, but is also a keen landscape photographer.  To see some of his beautiful images follow the link to www.pcphotographic.co.uk